Sample deliverable. Fictional 18-person company.

Shadow AI audit sample

Follow the data.

The tool inventory, findings and working documents from a Shadow AI Risk Audit, shown for a sample company. Every company detail and risk rating below is sample data.

A tool inventory with owners.

Sample AI tool inventory. User counts overlap; they are not a count of the whole company.
CategorySample use
Chat assistant on a personal account6 users. Drafting replies. Client contact details pasted. Owner: operations lead. Approval: unapproved.
Meeting summary tool4 users. Internal meeting notes. Pricing discussions included. Owner: sales lead. Approval: unknown.
Coding assistant on a work account2 users. Public documentation examples. Owner: technical lead. Approval: approved for public material.
Document drafting tool3 users. Internal templates. Account terms not recorded. Owner: office lead. Approval: pending review.

Where the data goes.

Sample data leaving the fictional companyClient contact detailsPersonal-account chat assistantProvider outside company boundary
Sample flow with the highest handling priority. The categories describe fictional use, not the safety of a named vendor.
Sample data-flow map. Each row is a separate route.
Data typeDestination and boundary
Client contact detailsPersonal-account chat assistant. Leaves the company boundary. No approval recorded.
Internal pricing discussionMeeting summary tool. External processing. Retention terms unknown.
Public code examplesWork-account coding assistant. External processing. Approved public-only route.
Internal document templatesDocument drafting tool. External processing. Owner review pending.

Risk ranking, highest first.

Sample risk priority: chat assistant 4, meeting summaries 3, document drafting 2, public code examples 1, on a 1 to 4 scale.Personal-account chat4Meeting summaries3Document drafting2Public code examples1
Sample priority ranks: 4 means act first, 1 means keep checking the approved route. The ranks set the order of work. They are not probabilities or a compliance score.
Sample risk ranking and reasoning.
PrioritySample finding
4: HighClient details in a personal-account chat tool. Stop the route while the owner reviews terms and data handling.
3: HighPricing in meeting summaries with unknown retention. Restrict recording until approved.
2: MediumInternal templates in a tool with pending terms review. Document the boundary and owner.
1: LowerPublic-only code examples in an approved work account. Keep the restriction and verify use.

Remediation checklist.

Sample remediation checklist. The business implements changes; the audit documents the decisions and verifies the agreed evidence.

  1. Operations lead: stop client data entering personal accounts. Verify with a staff walkthrough and a revised approved-tools list.
  2. Sales lead: pause sensitive meeting summaries. Record approval, retention and deletion terms before reuse.
  3. Office lead: classify templates and confirm which content may leave the boundary. Keep a reviewed example.
  4. Technical lead: confirm the public-only coding rule and record the account setting review.
  5. Business owner: approve the AI policy, brief staff and assign the next review.

AI use policy excerpt.

Sample AI acceptable use policy excerpt.

Use only the tools on the approved list and the account assigned for work. Keep client files, personal information and contract-restricted data out of AI tools unless the data owner has approved that exact route in writing. Use public or synthetic material for drafting while approval is pending. Review AI output before sharing it. Report an accidental disclosure to the business owner so the company can record what happened and decide what to do next.

SSP and action plan language.

Sample SSP and action-plan excerpts. These are drafting aids for the fictional company, not evidence that a real control is implemented.

Sample findings mapped to NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3. Confirm the applicable contract revision before using a real document.
RequirementSample document entry
03.01.03: Information flow enforcementSSP: The approved-tools register names permitted data types and destinations. The data owner approves exceptions in writing. Evidence pending: approved register and walkthrough.
03.01.20: Use of external systemsAction plan: Operations lead will document the terms and restrictions for the personal-account chat route. Close only after approval is recorded and the staff walkthrough verifies the restriction.
03.01.22: Publicly accessible contentSSP: Only approved public examples may be used for drafting intended for publication. A reviewer checks the result before release.

Requirement names: NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3. Source checked 2026-10-18.

Discuss your AI use.

Book a free AI risk call

Read the audit scope and price